Conducted/Coached Ensembles

All recordings on this page (with the exception of the Victor recording below), have been provided courtesy of the Curtis Institute of Music Archives and are being made public for the first time on this website.

The first three pieces below were part of one recording session. See page 194 of Laila Storch’s Tabuteau biography for details.

Gabriel Pierné: Prelude and Fugue Op. 40, No. 1 for Winds
Original Release Format: 78 RPM disc
Label: RCA Victor
Catalog #: 4332 A-B; matrix # BS 101607-1 & BS 101608-1
Date Recorded: 21 May 1936 in New York
Direction: Marcel Tabuteau
Woodwind Ensemble: Julius Baker & George Morey, flutes; Rhadames Angelucci, oboe; Bernard Portnoy, clarinet; Jules Seder & Richard Barron, bassoons; Ernani Angelucci, horn

[In addition, the C.I.M. holds test pressings of this recording: C.I.M. Catalog #: 777 & 777A (19360521-05) & (19360521-4) shown here, and the two pieces listed below.]

Richard Strauss: Serenade in E-flat Major, Op. 7 [Development and Recapitulation]
Format: 78 RPM set 
Label: RCA Victor 
Unissued; matrix # BS 101604-1 [missing], BS 101605-1 & BS 101606-1
C.I.M. Catalog #: 1023 [missing], 1023A & 1023B (19360521-2) & (19360521-3)
Date Recorded: 21 May 1936, in New York
Performers: Julius Baker & George Morey, flutes; Rhadames Angelucci & Harry Shulman, oboes; Edward O’Gorman & Elvin Clearfield, clarinets; Jules Seder & Richard Barron, bassoons; William Weichlein, contrabassoon; Ernani Angelucci, Herman Watkins, Herbert Pierson & Franklin Lanning, horns 
[The performers were not listed on the record label. The names included here are from the program for the performance of this piece at Curtis the month before.]

Paul de Wailly: Aubade
Format: 78 RPM 
Label: RCA Victor 
Unissued; matrix # BS 101609-1
C.I.M. Catalog #: 1199 (19360521-1)
Date Recorded: 21 May 1936, in New York
Performers: Julius Baker, flute; Rhadames Angelucci, oboe; Bernard Portnoy, clarinet
[The performers were not listed on the record label. These names were included based on their recording of the Pierné: Prelude and Fugue at the same recording session.

This next recording is of Tabuteau coaching a clarinetist in his wind ensemble class that gives a taste of what a student had to endure. 

The following pieces were performed at the Curtis Institute of Music by various wind ensembles from 1936 to 1941 under the direction of Marcel Tabuteau. They were recorded on 78 RPM records to be subsequently aired on weekly radio broadcasts produced by Curtis. The dates written on the record labels indicate when the broadcast took place.

Ludwig van Beethoven: Quintet in E♭ Major for Piano and Winds, Op. 16  [1st movement: Introduction and Exposition through theme 1]
Format: 78 RPM [label blank]
Catalog #: 766 & sa193704048
Year Recorded: 1937
Performers: Jorge Bolet, piano; Harry Shulman, oboe; Bernard Portnoy, clarinet; Richard Barron, bassoon; Herbert Pierson, horn

Ludwig van Beethoven: Quintet in E♭ Major for Piano and Winds, Op. 16
Format: 78 RPM set
Catalog #: sr193903273
Year Recorded: 1939
Performers: Jorge Bolet, piano; others unidentified

André Caplet: Iskia Samaïsi from Suite Persane
Format: 78 RPM
Catalog #: 260 (19380428)
Year Recorded: 1938
Performers: Albert Tipton & Burnett Atkinson, flutes; Martin Fleisher & John de Lancie, oboes; Bernard Portnoy & James King, clarinets; Albert London & Manuel Zegler, bassoons; Mason Jones & Elwood Cauler, horns

François Couperin: Pièces de clavecin, 3e livre. No. 17–Petits moulins à vent (arr.)
Format: 78 RPM
Catalog #: sr193903273
Year Recorded: 1939
Performers: Unidentified

Charles Gounod: Petite Symphonie
Format: 78 RPM
Catalog #: sa193704048
Year Recorded: 1938
Performers: Burnett Atkinson, flute; Martin Fleisher & John de Lancie, oboes; William McCormick & James King, clarinets; Albert London & Manuel Zegler, bassoons; Mason Jones & Elwood Cauler, horns

Luigi Hugues: Allegro scherzoso, Op. 92
Format: 78 RPM
Catalog #: sr193903273
Year Recorded: 1939
Performers: Unidentified

Frederick Jacobi: Scherzo from Wind Quintet
Format: 78 RPM
Catalog #: 576 & sa193704048 (19370417)
Year Recorded: 1937
Performers: Albert Tipton, flute; Harry Shulman, oboe; William McCormick, clarinet; Richard Barron, bassoon; Mason Jones, horn

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart: Serenade in E♭ Major for Winds, K 375  [1st movement and 2ndMinuet]
Format: 78 RPM
Catalog #: sa194011165
Year Recorded: 1941
Performers: Ralph Gomberg & MacLean Snyder, oboes; Nathan Brusilow & James Rettew, clarinets; Sanford Sharoff & Walter Maciejewicz, bassoons; James Chambers & Joseph Eger, horns

Gabriel Pierné: Pastorale Variée, Op. 30 (arr.)
Format: 78 RPM
Catalog #: 766 & sa193704048 (19370217)
Year Recorded: 1937
Performers: Julius Baker, flute; Harry Shulman, oboe; William McCormick, clarinet; Richard Barron & Manuel Zegler, bassoons; Herbert Pierson, horn; Arthur Statter, trumpet

Gabriel Pierné: Prelude & Fugue, Op. 40, No.1 (arr.)
Format: 78 RPMs
Catalog #: sr193903273
Year Recorded: 1939
Performers: Unidentified

Gabriel Pierné: Tourbillon from Pastorale variée
Format: 78 RPM
Catalog #: sr193903273
Year Recorded: 1939
Performers: Unidentified

Maurice Ravel: Mouvt. de Menuet from Sonatine for Piano (arr. Hershy Kay)
Format: 78 RPM
Catalog #: Cat. # sa194004198
Year Recorded: 1940
Performers: Britton Johnson & Eleanor Mitchel, flutes; John de Lancie & Ralph Gomberg, oboes; James King & James Rettew, clarinets; Manuel Zegler & Sanford Sharoff, bassoons; James Chambers & Joseph White, horns

[Recording not yet available]

Camille Saint-Saëns: Caprice sur des airs Danois et Russes, Op. 79
Format: 78 RPM [Rehearsal with Tabuteau; also part of Caplet Suite Persane]
Catalog #: 878
Year Recorded: 1938
Performers: Jorge Bolet, piano; Albert Tipton, flute; Martin Fleisher, oboe; Bernard Portnoy, clarinet

Richard Strauss: Serenade in E-flat Major, Op. 7
Format: 78 RPM set
Catalog #: sr193903273
Year Recorded: 1939
Performers: Unidentified

Igor Stravinsky: Pastorale (arr.)
Format: 78 RPM
Catalog #: sa193704048
Year Recorded: 1937
Performers: George Morey, flute; Harry Shulman, oboe; Martin Fleisher, English horn; William McCormick, clarinet; Richard Barron, bassoon

Joaquín Turina: Mujeres Españolas, Op. 73 No. 1: La Gitane Amoureuse; No. 3: La Sevillane Joyeuse (arr. William Strasser)
Format: 78 RPM
Catalog #: sa194004198
Year Recorded: 1940
Performers: John Krell, piccolo; Britton Johnson & Eleanor Mitchel, flutes; John de Lancie & Perry Bauman, oboes; Charles Gilbert, English horn; James King & Nathan Brusilow, clarinets; Manuel Zegler & Sanford Sharoff, bassoons; Walter Maciejewicz, contrabassoon; David Hall & James Chambers, horns

[Recording not yet available]

Paul de Wailly: Aubade
Format: 78 RPM
Catalog #: sr193903273
Year Recorded: 1939
Performers: Unidentified

Digital transfer of the Curtis Institute’s 78 RPM Tabuteau recordings by George Blood Audio/Video/Film/Data.

Sections

Much of the material on this website is being presented with kind permission of the copyright owners. Any use and/or duplication of certain materials must be approved by the copyright owners. Therefore, you must seek permission at msmostovoy@comcast.net before using or duplicating any material to ascertain whether it is presently under copyright. Certain excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given as per the instructions you will receive from your inquiry. If this website has inadvertently posted material without the proper attribution or authorization, to remedy, please contact msmostovoy@comcast.net.

What's New!

Marc Mostovoy Replies to the Facebook Posts Attacking Marcel Tabuteau

An audio interview with Joan Browne (Champie), a private Tabuteau student in the early 1950s.

A photograph of the music stand that was in Tabuteau’s private studio in Philadelphia.

An autographed photo of Marcel Tabuteau inscribed to Joan Browne Champie.

An autographed photo of Marcel Tabuteau inscribed to Vladimir Sokoloff.

Marc Mostovoy Replies to the Facebook Posts
Attacking Marcel Tabuteau

When she learned of Joan Champie’s death, and read the obituaries, Katherine Needleman, principal oboe of the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra and one of two oboe professors at the Curtis Institute of Music, posted on her Facebook page and again via video a message of outrage. Needleman’s central paragraph, in which she addresses herself directly to Marcel Tabuteau, is as follows:

“I don’t care if it was 1952 or 1954. I don’t care what you did for oboe reeds, as if anyone cares that you sometimes scraped them longer with your knife than your predecessors—what an innovation! I don’t care what you did for phrasing, and I don’t care how many (mostly men) students you inspired with your abusive teaching, which lived on for generations because they were unable to self-assess and grow past it. I don’t care about your number system. If you did not admit Joan to Curtis because she was a woman, and if you “let” her sweep your floor as a reward, this is how I remember you. *** you, Marcel Tabuteau. You know what would’ve been a real innovation that would have provided us all some benefit? Being a Very Big Fancy Man who supported women in music.

Needleman’s outrage is the result of the mention, in Joan Champie’s obituary, that Tabuteau hesitated to accept women at the Curtis Institute because 1) the likelihood of their being able to pursue a successful career was limited; and 2) because, after a successful lesson, Tabuteau “allowed her to sweep the floor.” 

Point 1 is, very obviously, one of the sad facts of orchestral life in the United States in the 1940s and 1950s, and, alas, even beyond. Conductors at that time rarely hired women oboists. The increasing presence of women in symphony orchestras in the United States, and around the world, is one of the signs of the remarkable gains made by women since the mid-twentieth century, gains akin to those that have been made in this country by other groups long dismissed or long oppressed.

Point 2, apparently troubling–although possibly the result of Tabuteau’s well-known mischievous sense of humor, needs to be understood in context. Those of us who knew Tabuteau or who knew others who knew him well, acknowledge that he could be a difficult taskmaster and act cold in lessons—not only to his rare female students, but to all of those who came to his studio. And yet most of his students remained faithful and dedicated to him because of his demonstrative artistry and the richness of his teaching. As Joan Champie herself said, after explaining to me in an interview how trying it could be to withstand Tabuteau’s sometimes severe remarks, “each lesson was a gift.” Champie was a courageous young woman whose desire to learn from an artist obviously quieted the discomfort that she felt.

What is most distressing in Needleman’s tirade is the dismissal of Tabuteau’s reed-making, which was part of his effort to achieve a kind of sound that combined the best of the French and Viennese schools of oboe-playing (a kind of sonority that Katherine Needleman herself well produces) and the dismissal of Tabuteau’s concern with phrasing, which, as it gradually infiltrated the players who sat around him, became one of the elements that caused critics such as The New Yorker’s Winthrop Sargeant to call Eugene Ormandy’s band the “Rolls Royce” of American orchestras.

Needleman’s reference to Tabuteau’s “abusive teaching” goes too far. That teaching has lived on for generations not because Tabuteau’s students “were unable to self-assess and grow past it,” but because it incorporated logical and inspiring methods of making music come alive.

I take no pleasure in refuting Katherine Needleman’s profane tirade. Nor does anyone on our board think of the bad old days of male chauvinism as the good old days. The Marcel Tabuteau First-Hand website continues to remain dedicated to promoting the musical ideas of a man who in our view had a highly positive impact on the development of musical performance in the United States during his lifetime, and during the period since his death. I ask those reading this response and my initial reply below to forward it to others who might be aware of Needleman’s Facebook attacks, so that the facts may be known.

Marc Mostovoy
Website administrator

To Katherine Needleman: A Belated Reply to
Your August 15th, 2024, Facebook Post:
“𝐎𝐃𝐄 𝐓𝐎 𝐉𝐎𝐀𝐍 𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐌𝐏𝐈𝐄.”

Katherine—your post on Joan Champie was just recently brought to my attention: https://www.facebook.com/profile/100058038401756/search/?q=joan%20champie. Having interviewed Joan last year, I thought it would be appropriate to respond. Kindly post this letter on your Facebook page and website. Thank you.

First I want to say that I wish you did have the opportunity to get to know Joan. She was a wonderful person and so inspiring. I felt privileged to have interacted with her even though it was only for a short period of time near the end of her life. Having gained insight into her relationship with Marcel Tabuteau through our conversations (including the live interview), I wanted to pass on to you what I learned from her.

As Joan pointed out to me, it’s important to understand that things were very different in her time. Viewed through the lens of today, Tabuteau’s treatment of her seems unjust. But she was a trooper and willing to accept the indignities because of the invaluable things he taught her. She felt it was well worth it as did all the other students who studied with him.

The reason Tabuteau did not like taking women students was because conductors of the major orchestras at that time wouldn’t think of hiring a woman oboist—even a Tabuteau student. Tabuteau felt putting all his time and effort into training a woman was futile because there was no career path for them, and he tried to dissuade women from taking up the instrument for their own sakes. But there were some women who wouldn’t take no for an answer, and he reluctantly taught them. They included Joan, Laila Storch, Thelma Neft, Marguerite Smith, Martha Scherer, and Marjorie Jackson. And may I point out that everyone cherished the time they spent with Tabuteau despite the rough time he gave them. He also dished out the same tough treatment to their male counterparts as you know.

Now you might ask why Tabuteau treated all his students as he did. It certainly would not be acceptable today. But that’s the way it was then. Gillet (his teacher) and many teachers of that generation practiced that method. Tabuteau continued it because that is what he knew and grew up with. The students who couldn’t take it dropped out, but those who persevered were grateful for what Tabuteau taught them. As a footnote, many of Tabuteau’s students said it was great training to go through because it prepared them for playing under the difficult conductors they encountered afterward such as Toscanini, Stokowski, Reiner, and Szell—all dictators in their own right. 

Laila Storch’s biography contains numerous tributes by his students: woodwind, string and brass players; pianists, vocalists – all attesting how important he was to their musical lives. Tabuteau gave them something special that their own teachers couldn’t. Those who learned from him can’t all be wrong in their praise. He was a giant to them.

Throughout your post, you chastise Tabuteau for his behavior, measuring it by today’s values. I ask you to please take a step back and try to see things as they were then. Also try to appreciate what Tabuteau did to advance oboe playing and for the musicianship he instilled in so many. Today (July 2nd) being his birthday, let’s grant him the credit he deserves. 

Finally, most oboists of the Tabuteau school wouldn’t agree with you in dismissing his importance in regard to reeds, phrasing, and so forth. Indeed, Tabuteau paved the way for you too, Katherine, whether or not you wish to acknowledge it. Surely, he was far from perfect, but does he really deserve the full treatment you give him? I think not. 

Marc Mostovoy

Click here to learn more. 

Please provide your name and email address, and I will send you the whole story.