Articles in Other Periodicals

Upon clicking a link below, you will be brought to an article (or access to it) featuring or referencing Marcel Tabuteau and/or his teaching. Some entries were submitted without publication, date, or author identification. Once known, the information will be updated. Certain articles have been excerpted to be Tabuteau specific. Articles are listed chronologically.

The New School of Musical Art. The New Music Review. Vol. 4, No. 45 (August 1905): pp. 380-381. Tabuteau referenced on p. 380.

A Wind Instrument Player’s Club. The New Music Review. Vol. 5, No. 49 (December 1905). Tabuteau referenced on p. 586.

Curtis. Musical Digest. (December 8, 1925).

Curtis Institute Advertisement. The Etude. (April 1936).

Tabuteau Honored by French Government. Musical Courier. (December 15, 1937).

Marcel Tabuteau Honored by French Government. The Journal of the Philadelphia Orchestra (1937) vol. 47.

Oboist Enters the Legion of Honor. The Etude. (April 1938): 218.

At Curtis Institute Great Teachers Nurture Talent. Life Magazine. (December 12, 1938).

Tabuteau Soloist with the Orchestra. (October 20, 1939).

Orchestra’s Tabuteau Is Oboe Soloist – Tabuteau Mozart Quartet. (October [third week], 1939).

Music: A Little Garlic. Time Magazine. (November 20, 1939).

Phila. Orchestra Members Follow Many Hobbies. The Journal of the Philadelphia Orchestra (c. 1940): pp. 823, 826. Tabuteau referenced in paragraph 5.

Next Week’s Soloists. The Journal of the Philadelphia Orchestra (c. 1940): pp. 774. Tabuteau referenced in paragraph 2.

Philadelphia Men Form New Orchestra. Musical America, February 10, 1941, p. 256.

Fifty Years of American Orchestras. Steve Mencher and Rosanne Singer. Symphony Magazine. (July-August 1942). Tabuteau referenced on pp. 80, 86.

King of the Reeds. Time Magazine. (March 8, 1943): p. 32.

The Philadelphia Orchestra; Résumé of the Season 1946-1947. The Journal of the Philadelphia Orchestra (1946): p. 3. Tabuteau referenced in paragraph 4.

Picture Story behind the Baton. Coronet Magazine. (March 1946).

“Marcel Tabuteau.” James Collis. Woodwinds (February 1948): p. 12.

“Tabuteau Directs Curtis Ensemble.” Woodwinds (May 1948): p. 17.

Guide to a Flexible Tone. Harry Shulman. Woodwind Magazine. Vol. 2 (June-July 1950): pp. 4-5, 16. Tabuteau referenced in paragraph 5.

Unforgettable Festival at Prades. Laila Storch. Symphony Magazine. (July-August 1950). Tabuteau referenced in paragraph pp. 7, 9.

New Records. Time Magazine, (January 8, 1951). Tabuteau referenced in paragraph 3.

A Few Basics in Phrasing Part 1. Dominique-René de Lerma. Woodwind World. Vol 5, No. 6 (February 1953): pp. 4-5. Tabuteau credited in Part 2.

A Few Basics in Phrasing Part 2. Dominique-René de Lerma. Woodwind World. Vol 5, No. 7 (March 1953): pp. 6-7. Tabuteau credited under de Lerma’s photo at the conclusion.

Woodwind Profile: Marcel Tabuteau. Albert Kaufman. Woodwind World. (June 1953): p. 9.

Marcel Tabuteau Retires. James Collis. Symphony Magazine. Vol. 8, No. 9 (1954): p. 9.

Au Revoir et Bon Voyage. (February 4, 1954).

First Flute for 39 Years, an Interview with Donald Peck. Kathleen Goll-Wilson. The Instrumentalist. (May 1966): pp. 12-17. Tabuteau referenced on p. 15, 17.

Phrasing: A Matter of Feeling. Dominique-René de Lerma. Woodwind World. Vol 12, No. 9 (1967): pp. 6-8. Tabuteau’s concepts, but he is not referenced.

Request for a Scholarly Study of Reedmaking. Dominique-René de Lerma. Woodwind World. Vol 12. (September-October 1967): pp. 4. Tabuteau referenced in paragraph 2.

Some Reflections on American Oboe Playing. Peter Hedrick. Symphony Magazine. (December 1972): pp. 10, 22. Tabuteau referenced on pp. 10, 22.

*Léon Goossens—Master Oboist. Jerald Sundet. School Musician Director. Vol. 45 (1973): pp. 22-25.

Toward a Concept of Tabuteau’s Phrasing. Dominique-René de Lerma. The Instrumentalist. Vol. 28, No. 8 (1974): pp. 44-45. Tabuteau referenced throughout.

*A Pictorial Essay on Hans Moennig. Stuart and June Zetzer. The Clarinet. (Winter 1983).

Ray Still — Chicago [Magazine] Interview. Gordon Gould. Chicago. (September 1986).

Oboists, Exhale Before Playing. Joseph Robinson. The Instrumentalist. (May 1987): pp. 23-27. Tabuteau referenced throughout.

Musical Concepts of Marcel Tabuteau. Andrea Kapell Loewy. NACWPI Journal. Vol. 37, No. 2 (Winter 1988-1989): pp. 13-16.

John Mack: Oboe Disciple. Elaine Guregian. The Instrumentalist. July 1991. [Courtesy of Danna Sundet]

Historical–Germanic Celebration. Robert Cowan. BBC Magazine. Vol. 6, No. 12 (1996): pp. 86.

Letter to the Editor: Great Oboists. Douglas King. The Gramophone. (August 2005): p. 21.

The Phrasing Styles of Kincaid and Tabuteau. Lois Bliss Herbine. Flute Talk. (November 2005): pp. 22-25.

William Kincaid and Marcel Tabuteau: A Legendary Collaboration. Lois Bliss Herbine. Flutist Quarterly. Vol. 31, No. 2 (2006): pp. 46-51.

Creative Musical Phrasing. Wendell Rider. Journal of the International Horn Society. Vol. 38, No. 2. (2008): pp. 1-4. Tabuteau referenced on p. 1.

Forward Motion: Teaching Phrasing Using Marcel Tabuteau’s Number System. Joyce Chan Grabell. Journal of the American Viola Society. Vol. 29, No. 1 (2013): pp. 33-38.

Inside the Orchestra Section: Playing by the Numbers. David Bilger. ITG Journal.  Vol. 40, No. 3  (2016): pp. 61-63.

Centenaire de la mort de Georges Gillet (1854-1920). Lola Soulier. La Lettre Du Hautboïste, No. 44 (2021): pp. 20-27. Tabuteau referenced on p. 27.

*Reprinted in IDRS publications

Sections

Much of the material on this website is being presented with kind permission of the copyright owners. Any use and/or duplication of certain materials must be approved by the copyright owners. Therefore, you must seek permission at msmostovoy@comcast.net before using or duplicating any material to ascertain whether it is presently under copyright. Certain excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given as per the instructions you will receive from your inquiry. If this website has inadvertently posted material without the proper attribution or authorization, to remedy, please contact msmostovoy@comcast.net.

What's New!

Marc Mostovoy Replies to the Facebook Posts Attacking Marcel Tabuteau

An audio interview with Joan Browne (Champie), a private Tabuteau student in the early 1950s.

A photograph of the music stand that was in Tabuteau’s private studio in Philadelphia.

An autographed photo of Marcel Tabuteau inscribed to Joan Browne Champie.

An autographed photo of Marcel Tabuteau inscribed to Vladimir Sokoloff.

Marc Mostovoy Replies to the Facebook Posts
Attacking Marcel Tabuteau

When she learned of Joan Champie’s death, and read the obituaries, Katherine Needleman, principal oboe of the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra and one of two oboe professors at the Curtis Institute of Music, posted on her Facebook page and again via video a message of outrage. Needleman’s central paragraph, in which she addresses herself directly to Marcel Tabuteau, is as follows:

“I don’t care if it was 1952 or 1954. I don’t care what you did for oboe reeds, as if anyone cares that you sometimes scraped them longer with your knife than your predecessors—what an innovation! I don’t care what you did for phrasing, and I don’t care how many (mostly men) students you inspired with your abusive teaching, which lived on for generations because they were unable to self-assess and grow past it. I don’t care about your number system. If you did not admit Joan to Curtis because she was a woman, and if you “let” her sweep your floor as a reward, this is how I remember you. *** you, Marcel Tabuteau. You know what would’ve been a real innovation that would have provided us all some benefit? Being a Very Big Fancy Man who supported women in music.

Needleman’s outrage is the result of the mention, in Joan Champie’s obituary, that Tabuteau hesitated to accept women at the Curtis Institute because 1) the likelihood of their being able to pursue a successful career was limited; and 2) because, after a successful lesson, Tabuteau “allowed her to sweep the floor.” 

Point 1 is, very obviously, one of the sad facts of orchestral life in the United States in the 1940s and 1950s, and, alas, even beyond. Conductors at that time rarely hired women oboists. The increasing presence of women in symphony orchestras in the United States, and around the world, is one of the signs of the remarkable gains made by women since the mid-twentieth century, gains akin to those that have been made in this country by other groups long dismissed or long oppressed.

Point 2, apparently troubling–although possibly the result of Tabuteau’s well-known mischievous sense of humor, needs to be understood in context. Those of us who knew Tabuteau or who knew others who knew him well, acknowledge that he could be a difficult taskmaster and act cold in lessons—not only to his rare female students, but to all of those who came to his studio. And yet most of his students remained faithful and dedicated to him because of his demonstrative artistry and the richness of his teaching. As Joan Champie herself said, after explaining to me in an interview how trying it could be to withstand Tabuteau’s sometimes severe remarks, “each lesson was a gift.” Champie was a courageous young woman whose desire to learn from an artist obviously quieted the discomfort that she felt.

What is most distressing in Needleman’s tirade is the dismissal of Tabuteau’s reed-making, which was part of his effort to achieve a kind of sound that combined the best of the French and Viennese schools of oboe-playing (a kind of sonority that Katherine Needleman herself well produces) and the dismissal of Tabuteau’s concern with phrasing, which, as it gradually infiltrated the players who sat around him, became one of the elements that caused critics such as The New Yorker’s Winthrop Sargeant to call Eugene Ormandy’s band the “Rolls Royce” of American orchestras.

Needleman’s reference to Tabuteau’s “abusive teaching” goes too far. That teaching has lived on for generations not because Tabuteau’s students “were unable to self-assess and grow past it,” but because it incorporated logical and inspiring methods of making music come alive.

I take no pleasure in refuting Katherine Needleman’s profane tirade. Nor does anyone on our board think of the bad old days of male chauvinism as the good old days. The Marcel Tabuteau First-Hand website continues to remain dedicated to promoting the musical ideas of a man who in our view had a highly positive impact on the development of musical performance in the United States during his lifetime, and during the period since his death. I ask those reading this response and my initial reply below to forward it to others who might be aware of Needleman’s Facebook attacks, so that the facts may be known.

Marc Mostovoy
Website administrator

To Katherine Needleman: A Belated Reply to
Your August 15th, 2024, Facebook Post:
“𝐎𝐃𝐄 𝐓𝐎 𝐉𝐎𝐀𝐍 𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐌𝐏𝐈𝐄.”

Katherine—your post on Joan Champie was just recently brought to my attention: https://www.facebook.com/profile/100058038401756/search/?q=joan%20champie. Having interviewed Joan last year, I thought it would be appropriate to respond. Kindly post this letter on your Facebook page and website. Thank you.

First I want to say that I wish you did have the opportunity to get to know Joan. She was a wonderful person and so inspiring. I felt privileged to have interacted with her even though it was only for a short period of time near the end of her life. Having gained insight into her relationship with Marcel Tabuteau through our conversations (including the live interview), I wanted to pass on to you what I learned from her.

As Joan pointed out to me, it’s important to understand that things were very different in her time. Viewed through the lens of today, Tabuteau’s treatment of her seems unjust. But she was a trooper and willing to accept the indignities because of the invaluable things he taught her. She felt it was well worth it as did all the other students who studied with him.

The reason Tabuteau did not like taking women students was because conductors of the major orchestras at that time wouldn’t think of hiring a woman oboist—even a Tabuteau student. Tabuteau felt putting all his time and effort into training a woman was futile because there was no career path for them, and he tried to dissuade women from taking up the instrument for their own sakes. But there were some women who wouldn’t take no for an answer, and he reluctantly taught them. They included Joan, Laila Storch, Thelma Neft, Marguerite Smith, Martha Scherer, and Marjorie Jackson. And may I point out that everyone cherished the time they spent with Tabuteau despite the rough time he gave them. He also dished out the same tough treatment to their male counterparts as you know.

Now you might ask why Tabuteau treated all his students as he did. It certainly would not be acceptable today. But that’s the way it was then. Gillet (his teacher) and many teachers of that generation practiced that method. Tabuteau continued it because that is what he knew and grew up with. The students who couldn’t take it dropped out, but those who persevered were grateful for what Tabuteau taught them. As a footnote, many of Tabuteau’s students said it was great training to go through because it prepared them for playing under the difficult conductors they encountered afterward such as Toscanini, Stokowski, Reiner, and Szell—all dictators in their own right. 

Laila Storch’s biography contains numerous tributes by his students: woodwind, string and brass players; pianists, vocalists – all attesting how important he was to their musical lives. Tabuteau gave them something special that their own teachers couldn’t. Those who learned from him can’t all be wrong in their praise. He was a giant to them.

Throughout your post, you chastise Tabuteau for his behavior, measuring it by today’s values. I ask you to please take a step back and try to see things as they were then. Also try to appreciate what Tabuteau did to advance oboe playing and for the musicianship he instilled in so many. Today (July 2nd) being his birthday, let’s grant him the credit he deserves. 

Finally, most oboists of the Tabuteau school wouldn’t agree with you in dismissing his importance in regard to reeds, phrasing, and so forth. Indeed, Tabuteau paved the way for you too, Katherine, whether or not you wish to acknowledge it. Surely, he was far from perfect, but does he really deserve the full treatment you give him? I think not. 

Marc Mostovoy

Click here to learn more. 

Please provide your name and email address, and I will send you the whole story.